Tuesday, May 24, 2005

Bua Siam - North Hollywood

So it was with high expectations that we tried Bua Siam in North Hollywood. I've heard so many raves, from Jet Tila on KCRW's Good Food, to Barbara Hansen of the LA Times, and of course, my fellow Chowhounds on Chowhound.com. And with all things that you have high hopes for, Bua Siam didn't quite live up to it. Although, it wasn't disappointing on the scale that "Episode I - The Phantom Menace" was.

So we still thought it was a good meal. Just not great.

We started with the Pad Thai. I thought it tasted fine. Saucy, and assertively flavored, it had generous chunks of chicken meat and shrimp which were cooked perfectly. But my friend noted that it wasn't as good as Lotus of Siam's in Las Vegas. Although he was right, it was still a good plate of noodles.

The second dish was rice with sliced BBQ pork (cha su), Chinese sausage, and fried pork. The rice, which was doused with a sweet red sauce, was a little overcooked and a bit on the mushy side. The BBQ pork was lacking in sweetness and flavor. The fried pork, with bits of fat and skin was not hot off the fryer, so it wasn't crispy. The Chinese sausage however, had a robust flavor that gave the dish its redemption. The small saucer of sweetened soy and diced chili was also amazing.

Then came the two dishes we picked out of the $2.50 menu.

They were; mussels fried in egg and batter, and Thai spaghetti with chicken curry.

The mussels, served on top of bean sprouts, were nice and plump, a perfect match with the egg. A liberal spoonful of the sweet and sour sauce that came with it punched up the volume. The sauce had a peculiar characteristic of what I call "delayed heat". Four seconds will pass before the heat registers in your mouth. "Quite sneaky," I remarked.

The spaghetti with chicken curry was made of thin rice noodles, doused with a light chicken curry flecked with coconut and pickled greens. The taste of this dish was too subtle. You know the flavor was there, but because of the boiled rice noodles, the curry hid in the background and stayed there. Overall, we were more fond of the pad thai than this dish.

Then we tried the omelette with ground pork and veggies. This dish was interesting. Not quite an omelette, and more of a ground pork stir fry wrapped with an omelette. So it wasn't a singular entity, although we managed to get a bite of egg with every spoonful of pork that we ate.

Our final dish was fried tofu. This was a simple as it gets. Triangular pieces of tofu is deep fried until crisp and served with a saucer of sweet and sour sauce and ground peanut. I liked it, but again, this is something I make often. It's not something that anyone, or any restaurant can screw up. We treated it like a palate cleanser.

The tab for our meal was around $35. We felt that it wasn't bad for the variety of dishes that we got. We were pleased and sated, even if it didn't live up to our high expectations. Thai Nakorn in Garden Grove and Lotus of Siam in Vegas still remains our favorite Thai places.

But we were delighted that the restaurant interior was clean and spotless. The furniture and decor: IKEA all the way through, from the shelves, down to the chopstick trays.

Bua Siam Restaurant
12924 Sherman Way
North Hollywood, CA 91605


At 4:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This place is so clean, service is really good and the most of all, the taste is excellent! My Thai friend introduced me here and told me that Bua Siam is one of a few places where people can eat the REAL Thai food for affordable prices. If you are going to compare the taste of restaurants, you should compare them within L.A. anyways, not with one in Las Vegas!

At 12:40 PM, Blogger elmomonster said...


Thanks for the comment. The place is clean, and the service is nice, but have you tried Thai Nakorn in Garden Grove? Or Lotus of Siam? If not, I encourage you to try them. Garden Grove is not that far away from L.A., so no hotel rooms needed! HAHA!

Let me know what you think. It will have you comparing them with Bua Siam too! I guarantee it. Either you like it less or better, you'll be talking about the experience nonetheless.

Here's to good eating and good discussions!

At 2:12 PM, Blogger Maria said...

Alas, alas that Lotus of Siam is so far away. We went during a Vegas trip to celebrate my mom's 75th birthday. We also went to a bunch of other popular Vegas places, but Lotus of Siam is the meal that lingers in my memory. That crazy, peppery beef-jerky-like thing. The spring rolls in skins so crisp and thin I can still feel their hot shards gently shattering. The chicken curry ...

My mom lives in OC, so will be sure to try Thai Nakorn. Thanks!

At 6:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the whole "Lotus of Siam" thinkg is very interesting. I'm Thai, and I go back to Thailand every year. I feel very lucky to live here in LA as I think the city has the best Thai food in the country. I have been LOT twice, while I think the food is good and authentic, it's not up to par with the stuff we have here in LA. The flavors of food served here is much more similar to those found in Thailand.

My theory is that non Thai people have been caught up in the LOT buzz and feels that this is what "real" Thai food is supposed to taste like. So when go to other Thai places that doesn't really taste like LOT, they think it's bad.

Hope this makes sense.


Post a Comment

<< Home